When our great, established parties were celebrating the beginning of 2010, they have thought seriously, they could settle the Hydra network policy with a "We have understood "off his head. Your crazy retention was swallowed by the Constitutional Court and the access difficulty law disappeared in the non-application and evaluation of Nirvana.
It seemed as though the policy implications drawn from the Zensursula-nonsense and put a new credo of the day. There are no network policy projects with people be linked, distributed data protection placebo à la Google Street View to debate and hope that people are really as stupid as the politicians is always, so no one notices that the government itself that does the job. And above all, distribute Important decisions at EU or country level, so that as few noticing. The guideline is: we do so on as before, but try to hide it skillfully. And coupled with a little populism and David and Goliath-fuss. Fits already.
But now even railway station in Stuttgart, now's immigration debate, what do I care since my talk last summer? Policy is still only of topics that be hunted every Sunday when Anne-Will-chat over coffee through the village. It's not fashionable for a long time, energy to waste on long-term expertise! The network policy is nothing more than a Kleinostermettbach bypass, a gentle breeze, which evaporates as soon as one stomps a few other problems from the ground and the stupid people pre cattle foot throws.
What our politicians removed from reality is just forget that the power politics grow two heads if they have a knocking. Zensursula will be seen in future as the balmy breeze, if you will look back on it, they develop force WikiLeaks and the protest against the youth media protection treaty be. Regardless all 'of the ill-considered, short-lived, anti-democratic outpourings of our politicians, who can still come to us. For the first time the microcosm of German particularism in a sense which is made with world politics. Who the freedom in your own bathtub do not defend it is not granted on the open sea.
WikiLeaks is the traditional order in question. But where is the problem? We must learn to deal with change! The humanity had been since it exists. And has existed since mankind trying to change through monitoring and prohibitions will fail castrate. As we have seen it to file-sharing and how we experience in the broadcasting time limit to be.
It would not matter if the monitoring would be ineffective and Verbotswut simple. But the government controls remain even after the failure and adhere to our country while they wait to be otherwise employed. Perhaps access difficulty and youth media protection law treaty are initially annoying. The next step, but they are dangerous. At the latest when the "acute threat" is there. As for the U.S. to date with WikiLeaks.
We write the year 2011 and soon established parties are slowly but surely becoming more willing to be replaced. They understand not that the whole world is changing radically. And even worse is that they do not understand that they must adapt. After all, who designed this change is not arbitrary to share his fate on the Titanic. To dismiss the web as so unimportant that he holds for a niche, for it holds so unimportant that he sacrifices a coalition of peace to the wolves, but should go down well.
0 comments:
Post a Comment